Admin avatar
Full name:
Nickname:
Admin
Website:
Description:

Posts by Admin

Letter responding to Khmer Time on nline criticisms about Siem Reap Angkor International Airport services said to be aimed at tarnishing image

Comments Off on Letter responding to Khmer Time on nline criticisms about Siem Reap Angkor International Airport services said to be aimed at tarnishing image

Dear Editor of Khmer Time:
✔ Congratulations Spokesperson of the Ministry of Tourism for at least learnt to proudly accept the feedback and rating of international tourists, shortcomings of hospitality and international standards of customers services, and lay down action plans to improve. But The CEROC wants to see more commitments and professional deliveries of services from this key accountable institution directly funded by the nation-coffer money.

Letters issued by the Immigration Secretariat Office and SSCA found groundless responses to the customers’ complaints on both former and current SAI. The CEROC has always exposed constructive comments, feedback and ratings from the people domestically and internationally. SSCA as a professional agent must read the whole screenshots posted by the CEROC and conduct due diligence to read the original source in google first before issuing such irresponsible official letter.

The culture of denial and spitting accusations to the whistleblowers resulting in a bad reputation, chronic corruption, and deprivation. Looking at 10 countries of South East Asia, in google travelers’ experience rating, all Cambodia’s port of entry (PoE) have received the lowest rates (around 3.2 in average) non-comparable to Lao’s PoE.

Ministry of Tourism must put on shoulder of her pivotal roles to solve this low rating complaints by laying down viable action plans to ensure rating shall be higher in the next semester of 2024. Concrete actions must be endorsed and implemented. Other institutions or agents are considered substitute and please stop conceal actual Ministry of Tourism to take in charge.

Kindest Regards

សូមគោរព និពន្ធនាយក ខ្មែរថាមស៍៖
✔ អបអរសាទរអ្នកនាំពាក្យក្រសួងទេសចរណ៍ យ៉ាងហោចណាស់បានរៀនទទួលយកមតិកែលម្អ និងវាយតម្លៃភ្ញៀវទេសចរអន្តរជាតិដោយមោទនភាព ភាពខ្វះខាតនៃបដិសណ្ឋារកិច្ច និងស្តង់ដារអន្តរជាតិនៃសេវាកម្មអតិថិជន និងរៀបចំផែនការសកម្មភាពដើម្បីកែលម្អ។ ប៉ុន្តែ CEROC ចង់ឃើញការប្តេជ្ញាចិត្តកាន់តែច្រើន និងការផ្តល់សេវាកម្មប្រកបដោយវិជ្ជាជីវៈពីស្ថាប័នទទួលខុសត្រូវដ៏សំខាន់នេះ ដែលផ្តល់មូលនិធិដោយផ្ទាល់ដោយថវិកាជាតិ-coffer ។

លិខិតដែលចេញដោយការិយាល័យលេខាធិការដ្ឋានអន្តោប្រវេសន៍ និង SSCA បានរកឃើញការឆ្លើយតបដោយគ្មានមូលដ្ឋានលើការតវ៉ារបស់អតិថិជនលើ SAI ទាំងអតីត និងបច្ចុប្បន្ន។ CEROC តែងតែលាតត្រដាងមតិស្ថាបនា មតិកែលម្អ និងការវាយតម្លៃពីប្រជាជនក្នុង និងក្រៅប្រទេស។ SSCA ក្នុងនាមជាភ្នាក់ងារជំនាញត្រូវតែអានរូបថតអេក្រង់ទាំងមូលដែលបង្ហោះដោយ CEROC ហើយធ្វើការឧស្សាហ៍អានប្រភពដើមនៅក្នុង Google ជាមុនសិន មុននឹងចេញលិខិតផ្លូវការដែលមិនទទួលខុសត្រូវបែបនេះ។

វប្បធម៌បដិសេធ និងស្ដោះទឹកមាត់ដាក់ចោទប្រកាន់អ្នកទំលាយព័ត៌មានរមែងនាំឱ្យមានកេរ្តិ៍ឈ្មោះអាក្រក់ ពុករលួយរ៉ាំរ៉ៃ និងការធ្វេីបាបជនរងគ្រោះ។ ក្រឡេកមើលប្រទេសចំនួន 10 នៃអាស៊ីអាគ្នេយ៍ នៅក្នុងការវាយតម្លៃបទពិសោធន៍របស់អ្នកដំណើររបស់ Google ច្រកចូល (PoE) របស់កម្ពុជាទាំងអស់បានទទួលអត្រាទាបបំផុត (ប្រហែល 3.2 ជាមធ្យម) ដែលមិនអាចប្រៀបធៀបទៅនឹង PoE របស់ឡាវផង។

ក្រសួងទេសចរណ៍ត្រូវតែដាក់តួនាទីសំខាន់របស់ខ្លួនក្នុងការដោះស្រាយរ៉េតតិងដែលមានចំណាត់ថ្នាក់ទាបនេះ ដោយដាក់ផែនការសកម្មភាពដែលអាចសម្រេចបាន ដើម្បីធានាថាការវាយតម្លៃនឹងខ្ពស់ជាងនេះនៅឆមាសក្រោយនៃឆ្នាំ 2024 ។ សកម្មភាពជាក់ស្តែងត្រូវតែមានការដាក់ផែនការណ៍ និងអនុវត្ត។ ស្ថាប័ន ឬភ្នាក់ងារផ្សេងទៀតត្រូវបានចាត់ទុកថាបន្ទាប់បន្សំ ហើយសូមបញ្ឈប់ការបង្វែងដានពិតរបស់ក្រសួងទេសចរណ៍ ដើម្បីទទួលបន្ទុក។

ដោយក្តីគោរព

Source: https://www.khmertimeskh.com/501421886/online-criticisms-about-sai-services-said-to-be-aimed-at-tarnishing-image/

Facebook page: https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=1297002627773711&set=pcb.1297003574440283

https://youtu.be/kq6AbIAn5FU?si=pvlnjfW6tfHhWeJy
https://youtu.be/BR-85xoRGHI?si=umOVkcxbI745syFt


សន្លឹកឆ្នោតរបស់ខ្ញុំ សិទ្ធិសេរីភាពរបស់ខ្ញុំ យុត្តិធ៌មរបស់ខ្ញុំ”My Vote, My Freedom, My Justice”
[about us] [petition] [reform effort] [portfolio] [faqs]


សេចក្តីថ្លែងការណ៍ចំពោះសំណេីរច្បាប់បោះឆ្នោតកំហិតសិទ្ធិនិងដាក់ជាកាតព្វកិច្ច

សេចក្តីថ្លែងការណ៍

ថ្ងៃនេះគណ:កម្មការដេីម្បីសិទ្ធិបោះឆ្នោតរបស់ពលរដ្ឋខ្មែរនៅក្រៅប្រទេស សូមសំដែងនូវការជំទាស់ចំពោះលោកនាយករដ្ឋមន្ត្រីហ៊ុន សែន ដែលកំពុងផ្តួចផ្តេីមបង្កេីតច្បាប់ហាមឃាត់អ្នកមិនបានបោះឆ្នោតគ្មានសិទ្ធិឈរឈ្មោះអោយគេបោះឆ្នោត និងដាក់ជាកាតព្វកិច្ច ជាដេីម។

សំណេីរច្បាប់នេះគឺសំដៅជាចំបងទៅរកពលរដ្ឋខ្មែរដែលកំពុងធ្វេីការនិងរស់នៅក្រៅប្រទេសដែលពួកគេគឺជាសសរស្តំសំខាន់នៃការអភិវឌ្ឍន៍សេដ្ឋកិច្ច ផ្សព្វផ្សាយវប្បធម៌ វិនិយោគទុននិងភាពជាមេដឹកនាំល្អ ។ល។និង។ល។

ច្បាប់នេះជាការគាបសង្កត់បន្ថែមទៀតទៅលេីពលរដ្ឋខ្មែរឯនាយសមុទ្រដែលមិនមានសិទ្ធិចូលរួមបោះឆ្នោតពីទីតាំងឬប្រទេសដែលពួកគេកំពុងរស់នៅ សិក្សារៀនសូត្រ និងធ្វេីការ បន្ទាប់ពីមានច្បាប់ហាមមិនអោយពលរដ្ឋ​ខ្មែរមានសញ្ជាតិពីរឈរឈ្មោះឬចូលរួមដឹកនាំតួនាទីកំពូលៗរបស់ជាតិ។

យេីងខ្ញុំសូមទទូចលោកនាយករដ្ឋមន្ត្រីហ៊ុន សែន និងគណបក្ស ប្រជាជនកម្ពុជាដែលកំពុងកាន់អំណាចពិចារណាឡេីងវិញនូវការតាក់តែងច្បាប់នេះយ៉ាងតក់ក្រហល់ដោយសំដៅតែផលប្រយោជន៍ឈ្នះចាញ់ ផ្នែកគណបក្សនយោបាយរួចទុកស្ថាប័នជាតិនិងផលប្រយោជន៍ប្រជាជន ក៏ដូចជាសាមគ្គីផ្ទៃក្នុងជាតិជារឿងបន្ទាប់សន្សំ។

សូមអរព្រះគុណនិងសូមអរគុណ

១២ មិថុនា ២០២៣

Statement

Today, the Commission for the Voting Rights of Cambodians in Overseas, we would like to express our opposition to Prime Minister Hun Sen, who is initiating a law banning non-voters, no right to stand for election and mandate voting as an obligation.

This mandatory election law proposal is mainly aimed at Cambodians who are working and living abroad; they are the main pillars of economic development, promotion of culture, investment, and experienced leadership, etc.

This law is an additional oppression to overseas Cambodians who do not have the right to vote from the locations or countries where they are residing, learning and working, after the law prohibits dual Cambodian citizens from standing for or participating in leading the top roles of the nation was amended.

We urge Prime Minister Hun Sen and the ruling Cambodian People’s Party to reconsider while this law is hastily drafted, referring only to the interests of winning and losing political parties, and leaving the national institutions and the interests of the people as well as national unity as not a primary agenda.

Thank you and thank you

June 12, 2023


Fiery, vocal crowd rejects Lowell-Cambodia sister-city motions

Link to City Council Live Show

Fiery, vocal crowd rejects Lowell-Cambodia sister-city motions

https://youtu.be/MjSSIgAxkQw
Link to Original Video

Mayor Chau, Councilor Yem withdraw motions

  • The Cambodian-American community came out to the April 25, 2023...
  • The Cambodian-American community came out to the April 25, 2023...
  • The Cambodian-American community came out to the April 25, 2023...
  • The Cambodian-American community came out to the April 25, 2023...

3 of 3

The Cambodian-American community came out to the April 25, 2023 City Council meeting to speak out against motions to establish sister-city relationships between Lowell and Battambang and Phnom Penh, Cambodia. The motions were withdrawn after the motion sponsors failed to find a second to move it forward for approval. Mayor Sokhary Chau reads a statement in support of his motions.(Melanie Gilbert/Lowell Sun)By MELANIE GILBERT | mgilbert@lowellsun.com |PUBLISHED: April 26, 2023 at 5:39 p.m. | UPDATED: April 26, 2023 at 5:45 p.m.

LOWELL — The city’s Cambodian diaspora came out in force to Tuesday’s City Council meeting to speak out against two motions seeking to establish possible sister-city agreements between Lowell and the Cambodian cities of Battambang and Phnom Penh.

Both motions were withdrawn when it became clear that a second from another councilor to move the motion to the floor for vote would not be forthcoming. Councilor Vesna Nuon requested that the speakers be allowed to address the body regardless.

“I know that the motion has failed, Mr. Mayor,” he said addressing the city’s first mayor of color and the nation’s first Cambodian-American mayor, Sokhary Chau. “However, to be fair, there are people here who wish to speak.”

Both motions were submitted by Cambodian-American councilors, who appeared to misjudge the depth of feeling toward the government of Cambodian Prime Minister Hun Sen, who assumed power nearly 40 years ago.

The first motion, co-sponsored by Chau and Councilor Paul Ratha Yem, asked the city manager to have the Law Department provide a report regarding the establishment of a sister-city agreement with Phnom Penh, referencing a memorandum of understanding signed on Jan. 14, 2015.

The second motion, by Chau, asked the city manager and/or the appropriate department to begin the process to establish a sister-city agreement with Battambang.

Eng Chhai Eang came to the podium with Mu Sochua. He previously was a member of the Cambodian Parliament and is a vice president of the Cambodian National Rescue Party, a major opposition party to the Hun Sen regime. He remains exiled from his homeland, and lives in Lowell.

Sochua, who acted as his interpreter, was also a member of the Cambodian Parliament from Battambang and is second vice president of the CNRP. She is a former minister of women’s and veterans’ affairs.

“I lost my seat because the Hun Sen government took it away,” Chhai Eang said in Khmer to a hushed crowd. “I am here as a victim of regime of Hun Sen. I am here to speak against the establishment of agreement of Battambang and Phnom Penh as Lowell sister city.”

He described a political system in Cambodia in which mayors are not elected directly by the people, but are chosen and appointed by Hun Sen.

“The government in Cambodia do not work according of the people,” he said through Sochua. “Therefore, if you in Lowell agree to establish sister city with any city in Cambodia, you are then serving the regime in Cambodia. The Cambodian regime considers me as a terrorist, but America accepts me as a free man. I thank you for not considering this motion.”

Thunderous applause greeted his remarks.

Read more…

UNESCO and the Cambodian Villagers in Siem Reap

Op-Ed: sophanseng.info

This time, I am reminded of an article I wrote about “The Repute of Angkor Wat” in 2002. Once, the Siamese army tried to relocate the Ta Phrom Temple to rebuild in Thailand under the order of King of Ayuthya, those armies were beheaded and let them back a few to report to the King that all Khmer ruins were not abandoned as perceived. Few survival armies mentioned the swift and brave Angkor warriors whose villagers living in the nearby areas, appeared from the forest with horses and swords killed the Siamese armies in a sudden.

Bad rumours or news on Angkor Wat resulted in many catastrophes such as the burning of Thai embassy in 2004. When a Phnom Penh newspaper falsely reported that a popular Thai actress claimed that Angkor Wat belonged to Thailand, Cambodians rioted in the capital, destroying the Thai Embassy and dozens of Thai-owned businesses (Los Angeles Time).

UNESCO’s Authenticity

Prof. Dr. Ang Chulean, who were first President of Apsara Authority, and later were believed left the post because of his critical opinion against the building of toilets surrounding Angkor ruins complex, articulated the important villages and people living surrounding the complex. Those people and villages must not be relocated and demolished. In his interview with Thmey Thmey local online newspaper, he called those people and villages the “life heritage” reflecting the contrast to of those stone-castle heritage of Angkor Wat and nearby ruins.

Actually, the UNESCO’s Articles on Angkor Protection under World Heritage Scheme in the initial legal adoption chaired by King Norodom Sihanouk, descripted the important of having villagers settled around the ruins decades or centuries ago.

According to UNESCO’s online documentation, the Angkor Wat and nearby ruins heritage clearly unspoken of the dismantling and relocating villagers in order to avoid maintaining “status” as “world cultural heritage” listing with the UNESCO like what Prime Minister Hun Sen mentioned at all.

Current Scheme

With the repeating escalating speech to relocating villagers surrounding Angkor Wat and nearby ruins by Prime Minister Hun Sen, over 3000 people rallied to Banteay Srey commune headquarter in October 6-7-8-9, to protest against these relocating attempts. Villagers whom feared of reprisal and traumatized by egregious political intimidations, conducted both anonymous protests through social media and come out to the streets with face masked on, demanding the authority not to relocate them by allowing them to live peacefully in their inheriting property such as homes and lands; they reject any cost of compensation to relocate them; they reject negotiation with the authority; they are desiring only to live peacefully in their inheriting lands and homes passed to them many generations; they are proud of their ancestors leaving them current plot of land, etc.

According to Hun Sen, Ron Ta Ek new development is a new plot of land for those villagers to relocate to. Looking closely, the villagers most of them are new settlers to the ruins vicinity, accepted the small amount of compensation and monthly social service money (named poor certificate card), to live in Ron Ta Ek two years ago, hence the area itself is not visibly developed and most of the villagers are not living there, major homes are abandoned. They have come back to live where they can afford income and employment, or migrated to work in Thailand.

In contrast, like Sihanouk Ville or other special economic zone (SMDs) entire Cambodia, Cambodian tycoons and Chinese companies have worked with powerful Cambodian shareholders in the secrete and bribery deals to relocate villagers in the name of development. For Siem Reap, according to this news outlet, NagaCorp which is the notorious beneficiaries of Naga World Casino, is going to invest over 350 millions dollars covering lands of 75 hectare in the 500m distance surrounding Angkor Wat and ruins complex.

Future Recommendations

  • Abdicate the policy of development for the riches, or use development schemes as excuse to lure Cambodian citizens to be prey and dismantle their livelihood existence as well as family harmony.
  • Be confident on the UNESCO’s policy as well as United Nations’; all developments are placing human rights and human dignity first, not profit or partisan first at all.
  • Cambodian citizens must stand firm, from lessons learnt entire Cambodia, no body can help us beside ourselves. All Siem Reapers must stand up against all injustice and relocation policy, not only today, this month, but keep close pre-alert forever.
  • Use community media (social media, cell phones, youtube, twitter, etc.) effectively to protect your own interests.

Article by Sophoan Seng, October 15, 2022, @copyrights


Happy Canada Day 1 July 2022

The Prime Minister, Justin Trudeau, today issued the following statement on Canada Day:

“Today, we celebrate the country we love, and the people we share it with. Canada is home to over 38 million people: Canadians who live in cities and towns – big and small; people who are indigenous to this land; and those who’ve been here for weeks, months, years, or for generations.“

Canada is strong because of our diversity. No matter what our faith is, where we were born, what colour our skin is, what language we speak, or who we love – we are all equal members of this great country.“

Today, we celebrate the place we all call home. I know for some, our country’s historic wrongs can make that difficult. But while we can’t change history, we can put in the work to build a better future; one that reflects our values of hope, resilience, kindness, respect, and generosity.

“Generation after generation, Canadians have shown that we can deliver on those values. We did it when we adopted our charter in 1982, we did it when we took care of each other during the pandemic, and we do it every day when we welcome refugees with open arms.

“Today is an opportunity for us all to recommit ourselves to those values – values that the Maple Leaf represents. Because our flag is more than a symbol, it’s also a promise. A promise of opportunity. A promise of safety for those fleeing violence and war. And a promise of a better life.

“As we come together today, let’s think about what this country means to us – and tomorrow, let’s challenge ourselves to find new ways to live up to the great promise of Canada.

From my family to yours, happy Canada Day!”

===នាយករដ្ឋមន្រ្តី Justin Trudeau នៅថ្ងៃនេះបានចេញសេចក្តីថ្លែងការណ៍ដូចខាងក្រោមនៅថ្ងៃទិវាជាតិកាណាដា:

“ថ្ងៃនេះ យើងអបអរសាទរប្រទេសដែលយើងស្រលាញ់ និងមនុស្សដែលយើងចែករំលែកជាមួយ។ ប្រទេសកាណាដាគឺជាផ្ទះសម្រាប់ប្រជាជនជាង 38 លាននាក់: ជនជាតិកាណាដាដែលរស់នៅក្នុងទីក្រុងនិងរាជធានី – ធំនិងតូច; ជនជាតិដើមភាគតិចនៃទឹកដីនេះ; និងអ្នកដែលនៅទីនេះសម្រាប់សប្តាហ៍ ខែ ឆ្នាំ ឬជាច្រើនជំនាន់។“

កាណាដាមានភាពរឹងមាំដោយសារតែភាពចម្រុះរបស់យើង។ មិន​ថា​ជំនឿ​របស់​យើង​ជា​អ្វី កើត​នៅ​កន្លែង​ណា ស្បែក​ពណ៌​អ្វី ភាសា​អ្វី​ដែល​យើង​និយាយ ឬ​អ្នក​ណា​ដែល​យើង​ស្រឡាញ់​ទេ យើង​ទាំង​អស់​គ្នា​គឺ​ជា​សមាជិក​ស្មើគ្នា​នៃ​ប្រទេស​ដ៏​អស្ចារ្យ​នេះ។“

ថ្ងៃនេះ យើងប្រារព្ធកន្លែងដែលយើងទាំងអស់គ្នាហៅថាផ្ទះ។ ខ្ញុំ​ដឹង​សម្រាប់​អ្នក​ខ្លះ​ថា កំហុស​ជា​ប្រវត្តិសាស្ត្រ​របស់​ប្រទេស​យើង​អាច​ធ្វើ​ឲ្យ​មាន​ការ​លំបាក។ ប៉ុន្តែខណៈពេលដែលយើងមិនអាចផ្លាស់ប្តូរប្រវត្តិសាស្រ្ត យើងអាចដាក់នៅក្នុងការងារដើម្បីកសាងអនាគតដ៏ល្អប្រសើរមួយដែលឆ្លុះបញ្ចាំងពីតម្លៃនៃក្តីសង្ឃឹម ភាពធន់ សេចក្តីសប្បុរស ការគោរព និងសេចក្តីសប្បុរសរបស់យើង។

“ពីមួយជំនាន់ទៅមួយជំនាន់ ប្រជាជនកាណាដាបានបង្ហាញថាយើងអាចផ្តល់តម្លៃទាំងនោះបាន។ យើងបានធ្វើវានៅពេលដែលយើងបានអនុម័តធម្មនុញ្ញរបស់យើងក្នុងឆ្នាំ 1982 យើងបានធ្វើវានៅពេលដែលយើងថែរក្សាគ្នាទៅវិញទៅមកក្នុងអំឡុងពេលជំងឺរាតត្បាត ហើយយើងធ្វើវាជារៀងរាល់ថ្ងៃនៅពេលដែលយើងស្វាគមន៍ជនភៀសខ្លួនដោយបើកចំហរ។“ថ្ងៃនេះគឺជាឱកាសមួយសម្រាប់យើងទាំងអស់គ្នាដើម្បីប្តេជ្ញាខ្លួនយើងចំពោះគុណតម្លៃទាំងនោះ – តម្លៃដែលស្លឹក Maple តំណាងឱ្យ។ ដោយសារតែទង់ជាតិរបស់យើងគឺលើសពីនិមិត្តសញ្ញា វាក៏ជាការសន្យាផងដែរ។ ការសន្យានៃឱកាស។ ការសន្យាសុវត្ថិភាពសម្រាប់អ្នកដែលភៀសខ្លួនចេញពីអំពើហិង្សា និងសង្គ្រាម។ និងការសន្យានៃជីវិតកាន់តែប្រសើរ។

“នៅពេលយើងមកជាមួយគ្នាថ្ងៃនេះ ចូរយើងគិតអំពីអ្វីដែលប្រទេសនេះមានន័យចំពោះយើង ហើយថ្ងៃស្អែក ចូរយើងប្រកួតប្រជែងគ្នាដើម្បីស្វែងរកវិធីថ្មីដើម្បីរស់នៅតាមការសន្យាដ៏អស្ចារ្យរបស់ប្រទេសកាណាដា។

ពីគ្រួសាររបស់ខ្ញុំទៅកាន់អ្នក រីករាយថ្ងៃទិវាជាតិកាណាដា!”


Letter: A Neutral Election Body Would Accept Chao Ratanak Complaint

Letter: A Neutral Election Body Would Accept Chao Ratanak Complaint

Op-Ed: VOD English

Chao Ratanak, Candlelight Party’s commune chief candidate in Poipet commune, stands next to her father, Chao Veasna, a former opposition councilor in the commune, outside her house on May 14, 2022. (Matt Surrusco/VOD)

Chao Ratanak, Candlelight Party’s commune chief candidate in Poipet commune, stands next to her father, Chao Veasna, a former opposition councilor in the commune, outside her house on May 14, 2022. (Matt Surrusco/VOD)🔊 Listen to this

Reading the article “Election Committee Rejects Candlelight Complaint Due to Lack of Specifics” recalls to mind how for Cambodian voters back in the 1998 national election — after the coup d’etat in 1997 — the legacy of the professional election institution built by the UNTAC was demolished and a new National Election Committee rebuilt. And in 2017, when the Cambodia National Rescue Party was dissolved, the legacy of an NEC created by the spirit of “culture of dialogue” was also demolished.

The response of the local election committee in the latest case is not a surprise, as the professionalism of neutrality has not been embedded in their workmanship at all. If this local election committee was well-trained, comprehensive, professional, and fearless to perform their duty without reprisal, they would try to accommodate complaints filed by Chao Ratanak without creating any further obstruction. But their performance shows not only an incapability for professional conduct but also bias toward the ruling party without doubt.

Observing the leadership structure of the current NEC, regardless of the instalment of party activists, the bureaucratic hierarchy from the national level to provincial level and to local agents is not necessary at all, and this structure creates more avenues to favor the ruling party than to serve the interests of voters. The judicial system being used as a political tool for the ruling party also disincentivizes professional conduct for the NEC and its staff.

Since Cambodia has conducted elections according to the spirit of Paris Peace Agreements, only two elections have been regarded as credible and professional, i.e. 1993 and 2017. Hence, the political maturity of the Cambodian people and their dynamic activism have paved concrete hope for the betterment in the near future. 

Sophoan Seng
President, Committee for Election Right of Overseas Cambodians

===

លិខិត៖ បើស្ថាប័នរៀបចំការបោះឆ្នោតអព្យាក្រឹត គេនឹងទទួលយកពាក្យបណ្តឹង ចៅ រតនៈ

សេង សោភ័ណ្ឌ
| ថ្ងៃចន្ទ ទី១៣ ខែមិថុនា ឆ្នាំ២០២២ ម៉ោង ១០:០៣ ព្រឹក


ការអានអត្ថបទ “គណៈកម្មាធិការរៀបចំការបោះឆ្នោតបដិសេធការតវ៉ាដោយភ្លើងទៀនដោយចោទថាខ្វះភាពច្បាស់លាស់” រំលឹកឡើងវិញពីរបៀបដែលអ្នកបោះឆ្នោតកម្ពុជាត្រលប់ទៅការបោះឆ្នោតជាតិឆ្នាំ 1998 បន្ទាប់ពីរដ្ឋប្រហារឆ្នាំ 1997 កេរដំណែលនៃស្ថាប័នបោះឆ្នោតមានវិជ្ជាជីវៈដែលបង្កើតឡើងដោយអ៊ុនតាក់គឺរុះរើចោល ហើយ​គណៈកម្មាធិការ​ជាតិ​រៀបចំ​ការ​បោះឆ្នោត​ថ្មី​មួយ​ទៀត​ត្រូវ​បាន​គេ​កសាងសង់​ថ្មីឡើង​វិញ។ ហើយនៅឆ្នាំ ២០១៧ នៅពេលដែលគណបក្សសង្គ្រោះជាតិត្រូវបានរំលាយ កេរដំណែលរបស់ គ.ជ.ប ដែលបង្កើតឡើងដោយស្មារតី “វប្បធម៌សន្ទនា” ក៏ត្រូវបានបំផ្លាញចោលផងដែរ។

ការឆ្លើយតបរបស់គណៈកម្មាធិការជាតិរៀបចំការបោះឆ្នោតមូលដ្ឋាននៅក្នុងករណីចុងក្រោយនេះមិនមែនជាការភ្ញាក់ផ្អើលនោះទេ ព្រោះវិជ្ជាជីវៈនៃអព្យាក្រឹតភាពមិនត្រូវបានបង្កប់នៅក្នុងផ្នត់គំនិតរបស់ពួកគេទាល់តែសោះ។ ប្រសិនបើគណៈកម្មការជាតិរៀបចំការបោះឆ្នោតមូលដ្ឋាននេះ មានការបណ្តុះបណ្តាលត្រឹមត្រូវ ចំណេះដឹងទូលំទូលាយ មានវិជ្ជាជីវៈ និងគ្មានការភ័យខ្លាចក្នុងការបំពេញកាតព្វកិច្ចដោយមិនមានការសងសឹកណាមួយទេនោះ ពួកគេនឹងព្យាយាមដោះស្រាយបណ្តឹងដែលប្តឹងដោយ ចៅ រតនៈ ដោយមិនមានការបង្កជាឧបសគ្គអ្វីតទៅទៀត។ ប៉ុន្តែ​ការ​អនុវត្ត​របស់​ពួកគេ​មិន​ត្រឹម​តែ​បង្ហាញ​ពី​ភាព​អសមត្ថភាព​សម្រាប់​ការ​ប្រព្រឹត្តមុខ​វិជ្ជាជីវៈ​ប៉ុណ្ណោះ​ទេ ប៉ុន្តែ​ថែម​ទាំង​លម្អៀង​ទៅ​កាន់​គណបក្ស​កាន់​អំណាច​ដោយ​គ្មាន​ការ​សង្ស័យ​។

ការសង្កេតលើរចនាសម្ព័ន្ធដឹកនាំរបស់ គ.ជ.ប បច្ចុប្បន្ន ដោយមិនគិតពីការដំឡើងសកម្មជនបក្សនោះទេ ឋានានុក្រមការិយាធិបតេយ្យពីថ្នាក់ជាតិដល់ថ្នាក់ខេត្ត និងភ្នាក់ងារមូលដ្ឋានគឺមិនចាំបាច់ទាល់តែសោះ ហើយរចនាសម្ព័ន្ធនេះវារឹតតែបង្កើតនូវមធ្យោបាយជាច្រើនទៀតដើម្បីអនុគ្រោះនិងលំអៀងទៅរកគណបក្សកាន់អំណាច ជាជាងបម្រើផលប្រយោជន៍អ្នកបោះឆ្នោត។ ប្រព័ន្ធ​តុលាការ​ដែល​ត្រូវ​បាន​គេ​ប្រើ​ជា​ឧបករណ៍​នយោបាយ​សម្រាប់​គណបក្ស​កាន់​អំណាច​ក៏​បាន​បង្អាក់​បន្ទុចការ​ប្រព្រឹត្តមុខ​វិជ្ជាជីវៈ​ដល់ គ.ជ.ប និង​បុគ្គលិក​របស់​ខ្លួន។

ចាប់តាំងពីប្រទេសកម្ពុជាបានរៀបចំការបោះឆ្នោតស្របតាមស្មារតីនៃកិច្ចព្រមព្រៀងទីក្រុងប៉ារីស មានតែការបោះឆ្នោតពីរប៉ុណ្ណោះដែលត្រូវបានចាត់ទុកថាគួរឱ្យទុកចិត្ត និងប្រកបដោយវិជ្ជាជីវៈ ពោលគឺឆ្នាំ ១៩៩៣ និងឆ្នាំ ២០១៧។ ទោះយ៉ាងណាក៏ដោយ ភាពចាស់ទុំខាងនយោបាយរបស់ប្រជាពលរដ្ឋខ្មែរ និងសកម្មភាពសង្គមដ៏ស្វាហាប់របស់ពួកគេ បានក្រាលគ្រឹៈប៉េតុងនូវក្តីសង្ឃឹមជាក់ស្តែងសម្រាប់ភាពល្អប្រសើរ នាពេលខាងមុខ។

សេង សោភ័ណ្ឌ
ប្រធានគណៈកម្មាធិការដើម្បីសិទ្ធិបោះឆ្នោតរបស់ពលរដ្ឋខ្មែរនៅក្រៅប្រទេស